INDIANAPOLIS—The NCAA Division I Infractions Appeals Committee has upheld findings of violations and a five-year show cause penalty for the former assistant men’s basketball coach at Long Beach State University.

Under this show cause penalty, should the former assistant coach seek athletically related employment with any NCAA institution during this time period, the individual and the hiring institution must appear before the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions to determine whether his duties should be limited.

In March 2008, the Committee on Infractions issued an infractions report that included findings of violations in the men’s basketball program for Long Beach State.  This case centered on violations of NCAA rules regarding offers and inducements; extra benefits and telephone contact; and unethical conduct by the former assistant coach.

The Committee on Infractions found that the former assistant coach paid for or arranged payment for certain expenses related to coursework for six student-athletes; provided impermissible transportation for one of the student-athletes; during three separate interviews, he provided false information to investigators; and persuaded three student-athletes to provide false information during the investigation.

In his appeal, the former assistant coach asserted that the violation findings should be set aside because they are inaccurate. The former assistant coach also asserted that the show cause penalty was excessive or inappropriate.

The appeal was reviewed by the Infractions Appeals Committee in July 2008. In considering the former assistant coach’s appeal, the Infractions Appeals Committee reviewed the notice of appeal; the transcript of the university’s Committee on Infractions hearing; and the submissions by the former assistant coach and the Committee on Infractions.

In reviewing the case, the Infractions Appeals Committee may overturn a determination of fact or violation finding only if the Committee on Infractions’ finding is contrary to the evidence presented; the facts found by the committee do not constitute a violation of NCAA rules; or a procedural error affected the reliability of information that was used to support the findings. The Committee on Infractions, not the Infractions Appeals Committee, determines the credibility of the evidence.

In affirming the violations and penalties, the Infractions Appeals Committee found “no basis to conclude that any finding was clearly contrary to the evidence or that the penalty imposed was excessive or inappropriate.”