2013 DI Softball Championships
Team Statistics
Overall Statistics
2013 DI Softball Championships
Conference Overall Statistics (as of Jun 05, 2013)
(All games Sorted by Batting avg)
Team AVG G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI TB SLG% BB HBP SO GDP OB% SF SH SB-ATT PO A E FLD%
Alabama............. .354 5 127 29 45 3 0 4 26 60 .472 18 2 21 0 .428 5 7 7-8 96 30 5 .962
Oklahoma............ .343 10 271 91 93 19 4 13 80 159 .587 56 4 51 0 .459 2 8 7-7 198 71 4 .985
Baylor.............. .338 5 133 29 45 7 0 3 28 61 .459 23 3 20 3 .444 1 1 8-8 94 21 4 .966
UCLA................ .337 5 163 36 55 3 1 6 33 78 .479 17 2 29 1 .404 1 8 5-5 115 40 3 .981
Texas A&M........... .311 6 135 33 42 2 0 13 33 83 .615 19 3 40 1 .408 0 1 4-5 100 46 1 .993
Houston............. .305 3 82 12 25 4 1 1 12 34 .415 7 4 8 2 .379 2 5 2-3 60 35 4 .960
Arkansas............ .300 4 100 16 30 4 1 3 12 45 .450 17 4 14 0 .418 1 0 4-4 75 25 6 .943
California.......... .288 4 111 15 32 2 0 5 14 49 .441 15 0 18 0 .373 0 2 2-2 81 38 6 .952
Notre Dame.......... .286 2 56 4 16 1 0 0 2 17 .304 3 0 9 0 .322 0 0 1-3 39 13 4 .929
Texas............... .278 9 216 41 60 9 2 9 39 100 .463 27 2 41 0 .359 3 5 18-19 174 42 4 .982
South Carolina...... .276 4 98 13 27 4 0 2 13 37 .378 13 4 20 1 .383 0 2 0-0 75 25 7 .935
Stanford............ .270 4 111 14 30 3 0 2 13 39 .351 13 3 19 0 .362 0 0 2-3 81 22 5 .954
Louisville.......... .270 3 74 8 20 0 0 1 7 23 .311 4 1 19 0 .316 0 2 2-2 54 28 4 .953
Fordham............. .260 3 77 8 20 1 0 2 7 27 .351 7 1 15 0 .326 1 0 1-1 60 32 3 .968
Nebraska............ .257 8 257 44 66 10 0 6 39 94 .366 24 5 42 1 .324 7 5 4-6 204 96 13 .958
Tennessee........... .254 10 280 40 71 13 2 6 38 106 .379 39 7 61 2 .356 3 11 11-13 228 84 9 .972
Kentucky............ .253 6 154 15 39 1 0 7 13 61 .396 18 0 22 0 .331 0 6 4-4 126 56 4 .978
Arizona State....... .253 7 174 22 44 5 2 6 21 71 .408 16 1 25 2 .316 2 2 4-6 144 37 4 .978
Hofstra............. .250 5 136 20 34 4 0 5 17 53 .390 15 3 24 0 .338 0 2 1-2 102 28 4 .970
Oregon State........ .247 3 89 10 22 4 1 1 10 31 .348 2 2 15 0 .280 0 1 1-1 69 33 0 1.000
Oregon.............. .242 6 165 19 40 2 0 4 17 54 .327 23 1 29 5 .337 1 4 7-8 138 39 7 .962
LSU................. .242 4 95 14 23 4 0 0 12 27 .284 9 5 19 0 .333 2 7 2-3 78 21 4 .961
Arizona............. .241 3 79 7 19 2 0 0 6 21 .266 2 4 16 1 .287 2 3 0-0 63 19 2 .976
Georgia............. .240 4 104 12 25 1 0 3 11 35 .337 2 1 25 0 .259 1 1 4-4 81 34 2 .983
Army................ .236 2 55 5 13 1 0 0 5 14 .255 5 0 14 0 .300 0 1 0-0 39 12 0 1.000
Western Kentucky.... .234 4 94 13 22 2 1 3 10 35 .372 7 0 16 0 .287 0 4 2-3 75 28 4 .963
Marist.............. .234 2 47 3 11 1 0 0 3 12 .255 4 0 15 0 .294 0 0 0-0 30 17 4 .922
San Diego State..... .234 3 77 10 18 2 0 2 10 26 .338 7 0 11 0 .298 0 3 0-0 60 24 3 .966
Marshall............ .233 3 103 6 24 0 1 1 5 29 .282 10 2 25 0 .313 0 3 7-7 80 31 6 .949
South Alabama....... .231 5 143 23 33 2 2 3 17 48 .336 12 2 32 0 .299 0 3 0-0 105 38 5 .966
North Carolina...... .224 3 85 5 19 5 0 1 3 27 .318 5 1 19 0 .272 1 1 0-0 66 19 7 .924
Wisconsin........... .222 4 108 14 24 2 0 2 11 32 .296 8 5 23 1 .301 2 3 7-7 85 33 3 .975
Central Michigan.... .222 2 54 5 12 3 0 2 5 21 .389 2 0 17 0 .250 0 1 2-2 39 15 4 .931
Florida............. .220 8 227 36 50 7 2 5 33 76 .335 39 17 73 0 .373 1 7 12-14 186 72 7 .974
UAB................. .212 6 170 20 36 6 2 1 17 49 .288 21 4 36 0 .310 2 1 4-6 139 53 6 .970
Louisiana-Lafayette. .206 6 155 16 32 1 0 7 15 54 .348 14 2 27 1 .281 0 0 2-2 123 32 3 .981
James Madison....... .203 3 74 9 15 0 1 1 8 20 .270 1 0 7 0 .213 0 1 0-1 60 20 3 .964
Central Connecticut. .200 3 75 11 15 2 1 2 9 25 .333 8 2 31 1 .294 0 1 3-4 57 13 8 .897
WASHINGTON.......... .199 9 206 25 41 4 1 6 22 65 .316 28 4 49 3 .305 1 9 5-8 188 73 4 .985
Michigan............ .195 9 220 23 43 6 0 6 23 67 .305 29 7 63 1 .309 0 6 5-7 186 90 11 .962
Florida State....... .186 6 156 16 29 4 0 4 13 45 .288 9 0 46 0 .230 0 0 3-4 126 37 8 .953
USC Upstate......... .186 3 70 8 13 3 1 0 4 18 .257 4 0 10 0 .230 0 2 3-3 54 19 4 .948
Virginia Tech....... .183 5 142 11 26 4 0 1 9 33 .232 14 8 25 3 .293 0 7 3-3 123 52 9 .951
Jacksonville State.. .182 2 44 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 .182 1 1 8 0 .217 0 0 0-0 32 15 4 .922
Tulsa............... .180 2 50 3 9 1 0 1 3 13 .260 7 0 17 0 .281 0 0 0-0 36 17 0 1.000
Mississippi State... .178 3 73 4 13 0 0 1 4 16 .219 6 0 27 0 .241 0 1 2-2 60 11 6 .922
Northern Iowa....... .176 3 68 3 12 3 0 0 3 15 .221 8 5 22 1 .309 0 2 1-1 60 15 5 .938
Brigham Young....... .176 2 51 2 9 0 0 0 2 9 .176 4 2 18 0 .263 0 2 1-1 39 10 2 .961
South Florida....... .172 4 93 4 16 0 0 0 1 16 .172 8 4 21 0 .267 0 6 6-7 84 19 1 .990
Minnesota........... .171 3 70 5 12 2 0 0 4 14 .200 3 3 14 0 .234 1 2 2-4 60 25 0 1.000
Hawai'i............. .163 4 86 6 14 2 1 1 6 21 .244 6 1 37 0 .226 0 1 1-3 75 24 1 .990
Georgia Southern.... .159 3 82 4 13 1 2 1 4 21 .256 7 1 36 0 .233 0 1 0-0 69 16 2 .977
MISSOURI............ .157 6 134 10 21 5 0 3 9 35 .261 15 0 21 0 .242 0 3 3-4 117 57 12 .935
Longwood............ .146 2 41 0 6 2 0 0 0 8 .195 5 0 11 0 .239 0 1 0-0 30 16 2 .958
NC State............ .142 4 113 8 16 3 0 2 8 25 .221 10 1 27 0 .218 0 0 0-1 95 41 3 .978
Valparaiso.......... .138 3 80 7 11 0 0 1 5 14 .175 3 0 15 0 .169 0 0 0-0 60 17 3 .963
IPFW................ .122 2 49 1 6 0 0 1 1 9 .184 2 1 13 0 .173 0 1 0-0 39 8 3 .940
Penn................ .119 2 42 2 5 1 0 1 2 9 .214 5 0 12 1 .213 0 0 0-0 34 17 3 .944
San Jose State...... .104 2 48 4 5 0 0 2 2 11 .229 4 1 11 0 .189 0 0 1-1 36 6 2 .955
Stony Brook......... .089 2 45 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 .089 3 1 4 0 .163 0 1 0-0 36 14 1 .980
Northwestern State.. .087 2 46 1 4 1 0 0 0 5 .109 8 0 14 0 .222 0 1 2-2 39 11 2 .962
Portland State...... .085 2 47 1 4 1 0 1 1 8 .170 2 0 26 0 .122 0 0 0-0 36 18 5 .915
Team AVG G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI TB SLG% BB HBP SO GDP OB% SF SH SB-ATT PO A E FLD%
Miss. Valley State.. .049 2 41 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 .049 1 0 19 0 .071 0 0 0-0 35 7 3 .933
Hampton............. .045 2 44 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 .045 1 1 10 0 .087 0 1 0-0 36 10 1 .979
Totals.............. .231 6895 1591 29 782 .337 138 31 42 178-214 1967 .965
266 878 185 164 2326 725 1524 .315 159 5464 269
2013 DI Softball Championships
Conference Overall Statistics (as of Jun 05, 2013)
(All games Sorted by Earned run avg)
Team ERA W-L G CG SHO/CBO SV IP H R ER BB SO 2B 3B HR AB B/Avg WP HBP BK SFA SHA
Georgia Southern.... 0.61 1-2 3 2 1/0 0 23.0 12 3 2 4 16 0 0 0 74 .162 2 2 0 0 6
Louisiana-Lafayette. 0.68 4-2 6 6 4/0 0 41.0 21 6 4 21 51 4 0 1 140 .150 7 7 0 0 5
Marshall............ 1.05 1-2 3 3 0/0 0 26.2 24 6 4 8 20 2 0 0 99 .242 1 2 0 0 5
USC Upstate......... 1.17 1-2 3 2 1/0 0 18.0 10 6 3 4 9 1 0 2 63 .159 0 0 0 0 2
Virginia Tech....... 1.20 3-2 5 3 1/0 0 41.0 41 12 7 18 26 1 0 2 157 .261 5 0 0 0 3
WASHINGTON.......... 1.23 7-2 9 6 3/1 1 62.2 37 13 11 28 64 3 1 3 214 .173 5 3 0 1 6
MISSOURI............ 1.26 3-3 6 5 3/0 0 39.0 27 13 7 9 28 3 0 3 146 .185 3 2 0 0 4
California.......... 1.30 2-2 4 3 1/0 0 27.0 13 9 5 5 25 1 0 3 96 .135 0 0 0 0 0
LSU................. 1.35 2-2 4 4 1/0 0 26.0 9 6 5 7 34 1 0 3 88 .102 0 1 0 0 0
Tennessee........... 1.38 8-2 10 6 4/0 2 76.0 47 17 15 27 83 8 3 3 273 .172 7 5 1 0 6
Mississippi State... 1.40 1-2 3 2 0/0 0 20.0 14 9 4 4 24 1 1 1 75 .187 3 0 0 0 0
Oklahoma............ 1.48 10-0 10 7 3/1 1 66.0 33 16 14 24 95 3 0 7 228 .145 2 8 0 0 2
UCLA................ 1.64 3-2 5 1 1/1 0 38.1 22 12 9 15 31 3 1 1 133 .165 4 1 0 1 1
Hofstra............. 1.65 3-2 5 5 2/0 0 34.0 28 10 8 2 21 6 1 2 129 .217 2 1 0 0 3
Florida State....... 1.67 3-3 6 2 0/0 0 42.0 42 19 10 9 51 5 0 4 169 .249 0 0 0 0 5
Oregon.............. 1.67 4-2 6 2 2/1 1 46.0 39 14 11 5 53 5 0 2 177 .220 3 4 0 0 3
Wisconsin........... 1.69 2-2 4 3 1/1 0 29.0 19 8 7 10 21 3 0 3 103 .184 2 1 0 1 3
South Alabama....... 1.80 3-2 5 5 3/0 0 35.0 16 9 9 6 37 3 0 3 123 .130 2 0 1 0 0
Arizona State....... 1.90 5-2 7 4 2/0 1 48.0 27 16 13 20 41 3 0 7 168 .161 0 2 0 0 5
Texas............... 1.93 7-2 9 6 4/1 1 58.0 36 19 16 37 86 3 1 3 207 .174 4 6 0 1 3
Michigan............ 2.03 6-3 9 6 3/0 0 62.0 56 21 18 16 47 2 0 7 240 .233 3 0 0 0 2
Minnesota........... 2.10 1-2 3 3 1/0 0 20.0 13 6 6 5 29 2 1 1 72 .181 1 1 0 0 1
Florida............. 2.15 6-2 8 6 2/0 1 62.0 46 25 19 28 39 9 1 3 225 .204 1 5 0 2 5
Notre Dame.......... 2.15 0-2 2 2 0/0 0 13.0 11 7 4 7 12 1 1 2 49 .224 0 2 0 0 1
Nebraska............ 2.16 5-3 8 6 1/0 0 68.0 58 27 21 36 54 4 1 4 259 .224 1 7 0 0 5
Kentucky............ 2.17 3-3 6 5 1/1 0 42.0 30 15 13 15 19 2 1 2 145 .207 1 7 0 1 6
NC State............ 2.21 2-2 4 3 1/0 0 31.2 29 12 10 3 13 4 2 1 119 .244 2 3 0 0 3
North Carolina...... 2.23 1-2 3 3 0/0 0 22.0 18 11 7 5 19 2 0 1 80 .225 1 3 0 2 4
Georgia............. 2.33 2-2 4 2 0/0 0 27.0 24 9 9 5 12 5 1 2 102 .235 0 0 0 0 2
Portland State...... 2.33 0-2 2 2 0/0 0 12.0 6 7 4 8 3 1 0 0 40 .150 0 3 0 2 2
UAB................. 2.42 3-3 6 1 0/0 0 46.1 54 18 16 18 48 4 0 3 182 .297 3 6 0 1 11
Alabama............. 2.62 3-2 5 2 1/0 0 32.0 34 15 12 10 23 3 1 2 123 .276 2 2 0 3 4
Hawai'i............. 2.80 2-2 4 3 2/0 0 25.0 25 10 10 8 17 3 0 2 92 .272 0 1 0 0 4
Northern Iowa....... 2.80 1-2 3 3 0/0 0 20.0 23 9 8 3 22 1 0 1 86 .267 2 0 0 1 0
James Madison....... 2.80 1-2 3 2 1/0 0 20.0 15 8 8 8 14 5 0 2 77 .195 0 0 0 0 0
South Florida....... 3.00 2-2 4 0 1/1 0 28.0 17 14 12 15 43 3 2 2 101 .168 2 7 0 0 1
Oregon State........ 3.04 1-2 3 2 1/0 0 23.0 18 10 10 12 11 2 0 3 84 .214 4 2 0 0 1
Houston............. 3.50 1-2 3 0 0/0 1 20.0 29 16 10 11 12 5 0 1 85 .341 1 1 0 0 3
Tulsa............... 3.50 0-2 2 1 0/0 0 12.0 12 6 6 8 6 2 0 2 43 .279 0 3 0 0 2
Miss. Valley State.. 3.60 0-2 2 2 0/0 0 11.2 14 12 6 6 4 0 1 2 51 .275 0 2 0 0 1
Stanford............ 3.63 2-2 4 2 0/0 0 27.0 25 20 14 17 20 7 0 2 103 .243 0 2 0 3 1
Central Connecticut. 3.68 1-2 3 2 0/0 0 19.0 20 15 10 6 8 3 0 0 73 .274 0 2 0 2 6
San Diego State..... 3.85 1-2 3 1 0/0 0 20.0 26 14 11 2 15 1 0 5 85 .306 2 1 0 1 0
Fordham............. 4.20 1-2 3 1 0/0 0 20.0 28 13 12 12 5 3 1 0 84 .333 2 1 5 1 0
IPFW................ 4.31 0-2 2 1 0/0 0 13.0 17 10 8 3 14 1 1 1 57 .298 0 1 0 0 1
Brigham Young....... 4.31 0-2 2 0 0/0 0 13.0 12 11 8 14 8 0 0 2 49 .245 1 0 2 1 0
Baylor.............. 4.47 3-2 5 3 1/0 0 31.1 34 23 20 15 32 3 0 9 125 .272 2 4 0 1 2
Arkansas............ 4.48 2-2 4 1 0/0 1 25.0 34 27 16 18 20 6 0 6 110 .309 2 2 0 1 1
Western Kentucky.... 4.76 2-2 4 3 2/0 0 25.0 27 20 17 9 14 2 0 2 92 .293 0 1 0 5 7
South Carolina...... 5.04 2-2 4 1 0/0 1 25.0 34 22 18 7 11 1 1 3 105 .324 0 2 0 2 5
Valparaiso.......... 5.25 1-2 3 2 0/0 0 20.0 29 15 15 13 14 6 0 3 85 .341 2 0 0 0 4
San Jose State...... 5.25 0-2 2 2 0/0 0 12.0 14 10 9 4 4 1 0 3 48 .292 0 0 0 1 2
Hampton............. 5.25 0-2 2 1 0/0 0 12.0 17 10 9 7 8 1 1 3 51 .333 2 2 0 1 1
Stony Brook......... 5.25 0-2 2 1 0/0 0 12.0 9 9 9 8 5 2 0 2 46 .196 0 1 0 0 0
Jacksonville State.. 5.25 0-2 2 0 0/0 0 10.2 19 12 8 6 4 2 1 2 52 .365 1 0 0 0 0
Arizona............. 5.67 1-2 3 0 0/0 0 21.0 21 17 17 20 13 4 0 2 80 .263 2 1 0 1 1
Northwestern State.. 5.92 0-2 2 1 0/0 0 13.0 17 12 11 11 9 2 1 1 57 .298 1 3 1 0 1
Texas A&M........... 6.30 3-3 6 3 2/1 0 33.1 43 32 30 20 27 7 0 5 137 .314 3 4 0 0 1
Army................ 6.46 0-2 2 2 0/0 0 13.0 16 12 12 7 4 5 2 2 48 .333 1 3 0 3 2
Central Michigan.... 6.46 0-2 2 1 0/0 0 13.0 20 15 12 7 3 0 0 5 63 .317 1 0 0 0 0
Louisville.......... 7.39 1-2 3 1 0/0 0 18.0 25 27 19 9 12 2 1 4 81 .309 0 4 0 1 1
Penn................ 8.65 0-2 2 1 0/0 0 11.1 21 15 14 5 4 1 0 2 51 .412 1 2 0 1 2
Team ERA W-L G CG SHO/CBO SV IP H R ER BB SO 2B 3B HR AB B/Avg WP HBP BK SFA SHA
Longwood............ 9.10 0-2 2 1 0/0 0 10.0 12 14 13 5 3 2 0 3 44 .273 1 1 0 0 0
Marist.............. 11.20 0-2 2 1 0/0 0 10.0 22 22 16 10 4 4 0 1 52 .423 0 1 0 1 1
Totals.............. 2.69 266 57/9 1822.0 878 725 185 164 .231 138 42
133-133 163 11 1591 701 1524 29 6895 100 10 159
PB - Lady Toppers 3, MICH 3, BYU 2, MVSD 2, VT 2, UCLA 2, GSU 2, WASH 2, Crimson Tide 1, TAMU 1, SC 1, ORE 1, HOU 1, MSU 1,
MIZZOU 1, LOU 1, UAB 1, UF 1, CCSU 1, ULL 1, CAL 1, USF 1, Lady Vols 1, ARIZ 1. Pickoffs - Huskers 1, Cardinal 1, UGA 1, OU
1, MSU 1, VT 1.
2013 DI Softball Championships
Conference Overall Statistics (as of Jun 05, 2013)
(All games Sorted by Fielding pct)
Team C PO A E FLD% DPs SBA CSB SBA% PB CI
Oregon State........ 102 69 33 0 1.000 0 0 1 .000 0 0
Minnesota........... 85 60 25 0 1.000 0 1 1 .500 0 0
Tulsa............... 53 36 17 0 1.000 2 0 1 .000 0 0
Army................ 51 39 12 0 1.000 1 4 1 .800 0 0
Texas A&M........... 147 100 46 1 .993 3 1 0 1.000 1 0
South Florida....... 104 84 19 1 .990 0 5 0 1.000 1 0
Hawai'i............. 100 75 24 1 .990 1 4 2 .667 0 0
Oklahoma............ 273 198 71 4 .985 4 3 1 .750 0 0
WASHINGTON.......... 265 188 73 4 .985 3 3 4 .429 2 0
Georgia............. 117 81 34 2 .983 0 2 1 .667 0 0
Texas............... 220 174 42 4 .982 0 3 1 .750 0 0
UCLA................ 158 115 40 3 .981 1 4 2 .667 2 0
Louisiana-Lafayette. 158 123 32 3 .981 0 2 0 1.000 1 0
Stony Brook......... 51 36 14 1 .980 0 3 0 1.000 0 0
Hampton............. 47 36 10 1 .979 0 2 1 .667 0 0
Kentucky............ 186 126 56 4 .978 2 4 1 .800 0 0
NC State............ 139 95 41 3 .978 3 4 2 .667 0 0
Arizona State....... 185 144 37 4 .978 0 2 0 1.000 0 0
Georgia Southern.... 87 69 16 2 .977 2 5 1 .833 2 0
Arizona............. 84 63 19 2 .976 3 7 0 1.000 1 0
Wisconsin........... 121 85 33 3 .975 1 1 0 1.000 0 0
Florida............. 265 186 72 7 .974 1 5 1 .833 1 0
Tennessee........... 321 228 84 9 .972 0 5 3 .625 1 0
Hofstra............. 134 102 28 4 .970 2 1 0 1.000 0 0
UAB................. 198 139 53 6 .970 1 6 0 1.000 1 0
Fordham............. 95 60 32 3 .968 0 4 0 1.000 0 0
Baylor.............. 119 94 21 4 .966 0 1 1 .500 0 0
South Alabama....... 148 105 38 5 .966 0 4 0 1.000 0 0
San Diego State..... 87 60 24 3 .966 0 5 0 1.000 0 0
James Madison....... 83 60 20 3 .964 0 0 0 --- 0 0
Western Kentucky.... 107 75 28 4 .963 0 4 0 1.000 3 0
Valparaiso.......... 80 60 17 3 .963 0 4 1 .800 0 0
Oregon.............. 184 138 39 7 .962 0 2 1 .667 1 0
Alabama............. 131 96 30 5 .962 1 1 0 1.000 1 0
Michigan............ 287 186 90 11 .962 6 3 0 1.000 3 0
Northwestern State.. 52 39 11 2 .962 1 4 1 .800 0 0
LSU................. 103 78 21 4 .961 1 0 0 --- 0 0
Brigham Young....... 51 39 10 2 .961 1 3 0 1.000 2 0
Houston............. 99 60 35 4 .960 2 0 0 --- 1 0
Nebraska............ 313 204 96 13 .958 7 7 2 .778 0 0
Longwood............ 48 30 16 2 .958 0 1 0 1.000 0 0
San Jose State...... 44 36 6 2 .955 0 0 0 --- 0 0
Stanford............ 108 81 22 5 .954 1 1 0 1.000 0 0
Louisville.......... 86 54 28 4 .953 0 1 0 1.000 1 0
Florida State....... 171 126 37 8 .953 1 8 0 1.000 0 0
California.......... 125 81 38 6 .952 2 0 0 --- 1 0
Virginia Tech....... 184 123 52 9 .951 2 3 2 .600 2 0
Marshall............ 117 80 31 6 .949 1 3 0 1.000 0 0
USC Upstate......... 77 54 19 4 .948 0 2 1 .667 0 0
Penn................ 54 34 17 3 .944 3 3 0 1.000 0 0
Arkansas............ 106 75 25 6 .943 2 1 0 1.000 0 0
IPFW................ 50 39 8 3 .940 0 3 0 1.000 0 0
Northern Iowa....... 80 60 15 5 .938 0 4 0 1.000 0 0
MISSOURI............ 186 117 57 12 .935 1 1 1 .500 1 0
South Carolina...... 107 75 25 7 .935 2 3 0 1.000 1 0
Miss. Valley State.. 45 35 7 3 .933 0 0 0 --- 2 0
Central Michigan.... 58 39 15 4 .931 2 1 0 1.000 0 0
Notre Dame.......... 56 39 13 4 .929 2 7 0 1.000 0 0
North Carolina...... 92 66 19 7 .924 1 6 0 1.000 0 0
Mississippi State... 77 60 11 6 .922 0 0 0 --- 1 0
Marist.............. 51 30 17 4 .922 1 1 0 1.000 0 0
Jacksonville State.. 51 32 15 4 .922 1 5 0 1.000 0 0
Team C PO A E FLD% DPs SBA CSB SBA% PB CI
Portland State...... 59 36 18 5 .915 0 1 1 .500 0 0
Central Connecticut. 78 57 13 8 .897 0 4 1 .800 1 0
Totals.............. 7700 1967 .965 178 .832 0
5464 269 71 36 34
Category Leaders
2013 DI Softball Championships
Conference Batting Leaders (as of Jun 05, 2013)
(All games)
Hitting minimums - 75% of Games 2.5 AB/Game 2.5 TPA/Game
Pitching minimums - 1 Games 75% of Games 1 IP 1 BF 1 Decisions 1.0 IP/Game
Batting avg
-----------
1. Alabama............. .354
2. Oklahoma............ .343
3. Baylor.............. .338
4. UCLA................ .337
5. Texas A&M........... .311
Slugging pct
------------
1. Texas A&M........... .615
2. Oklahoma............ .587
3. UCLA................ .479
4. Alabama............. .472
5. Texas............... .463
On base pct
-----------
1. Oklahoma............ .459
2. Baylor.............. .444
3. Alabama............. .428
4. Arkansas............ .418
5. Texas A&M........... .408
Runs scored
-----------
1. Oklahoma............ 91
2. Nebraska............ 44
3. Texas............... 41
4. Tennessee........... 40
5. 2 tied at........... 36
Hits
----
1. Oklahoma............ 93
2. Tennessee........... 71
3. Nebraska............ 66
4. Texas............... 60
5. UCLA................ 55
Runs batted in
--------------
1. Oklahoma............ 80
2. Nebraska............ 39
Texas............... 39
4. Tennessee........... 38
5. 3 tied at........... 33
Doubles
-------
1. Oklahoma............ 19
2. Tennessee........... 13
3. Nebraska............ 10
4. Texas............... 9
5. 2 tied at........... 7
Triples
-------
1. Oklahoma............ 4
2. 7 tied at........... 2
Home runs
---------
1. Oklahoma............ 13
Texas A&M........... 13
3. Texas............... 9
4. Kentucky............ 7
Louisiana-Lafayette. 7
Total bases
-----------
1. Oklahoma............ 159
2. Tennessee........... 106
3. Texas............... 100
4. Nebraska............ 94
5. Texas A&M........... 83
Total plate appearances
-----------------------
1. Oklahoma............ 341
2. Tennessee........... 340
3. Nebraska............ 298
4. Florida............. 291
5. Michigan............ 262
At bats
-------
1. Tennessee........... 280
2. Oklahoma............ 271
3. Nebraska............ 257
4. Florida............. 227
5. Michigan............ 220
Walks
-----
1. Oklahoma............ 56
2. Florida............. 39
Tennessee........... 39
4. Michigan............ 29
5. WASHINGTON.......... 28
Hit by pitch
------------
1. Florida............. 17
2. Virginia Tech....... 8
3. Tennessee........... 7
Michigan............ 7
5. 4 tied at........... 5
Strikeouts
----------
1. Florida............. 73
2. Michigan............ 63
3. Tennessee........... 61
4. Oklahoma............ 51
5. WASHINGTON.......... 49
Sac bunts
---------
1. Tennessee........... 11
2. WASHINGTON.......... 9
3. Oklahoma............ 8
UCLA................ 8
5. 4 tied at........... 7
Sac flies
---------
1. Nebraska............ 7
2. Alabama............. 5
3. Tennessee........... 3
Texas............... 3
5. 7 tied at........... 2
Stolen bases
------------
1. Texas............... 18
2. Florida............. 12
3. Tennessee........... 11
4. Baylor.............. 8
5. 5 tied at........... 7
Caught stealing
---------------
1. WASHINGTON.......... 3
2. 9 tied at........... 2
Steal attempts
--------------
1. Texas............... 19
2. Florida............. 14
3. Tennessee........... 13
4. 4 tied at........... 8
Grounded into DP
----------------
1. Oregon.............. 5
2. Baylor.............. 3
Virginia Tech....... 3
WASHINGTON.......... 3
5. 3 tied at........... 2
2013 DI Softball Championships
Conference Pitching Leaders (as of Jun 05, 2013)
(All games)
Hitting minimums - 75% of Games 2.5 AB/Game 2.5 TPA/Game
Pitching minimums - 1 Games 75% of Games 1 IP 1 BF 1 Decisions 1.0 IP/Game
Earned run avg
--------------
1. Georgia Southern.... 0.61
2. Louisiana-Lafayette. 0.68
3. Marshall............ 1.05
4. USC Upstate......... 1.17
5. Virginia Tech....... 1.20
Opposing bat avg
----------------
1. LSU................. .102
2. South Alabama....... .130
3. California.......... .135
4. Oklahoma............ .145
5. Louisiana-Lafayette. .150
Innings pitched
---------------
1. Tennessee........... 76.0
2. Nebraska............ 68.0
3. Oklahoma............ 66.0
4. WASHINGTON.......... 62.2
5. 2 tied at........... 62.0
Batters struck out
------------------
1. Oklahoma............ 95
2. Texas............... 86
3. Tennessee........... 83
4. WASHINGTON.......... 64
5. Nebraska............ 54
Batters SO out looking
----------------------
1. Nebraska............ 19
2. Texas............... 16
3. Arizona State....... 15
Tennessee........... 15
5. Florida............. 13
Wins
----
1. Oklahoma............ 10
2. Tennessee........... 8
3. WASHINGTON.......... 7
Texas............... 7
5. 2 tied at........... 6
Losses
------
1. 7 tied at........... 3
Saves
-----
1. Tennessee........... 2
2. 9 tied at........... 1
Runners picked off
------------------
1. 6 tied at........... 1
Sac bunts allowed
-----------------
1. UAB................. 11
2. Western Kentucky.... 7
3. 5 tied at........... 6
Sac flies allowed
-----------------
1. Western Kentucky.... 5
2. Alabama............. 3
Stanford............ 3
Army................ 3
5. 5 tied at........... 2
Hits allowed
------------
1. Portland State...... 6
2. LSU................. 9
Stony Brook......... 9
4. USC Upstate......... 10
5. Notre Dame.......... 11
Runs allowed
------------
1. Georgia Southern.... 3
2. 6 tied at........... 6
Earned runs allowed
-------------------
1. Georgia Southern.... 2
2. USC Upstate......... 3
3. 5 tied at........... 4
Walks allowed
-------------
1. Hofstra............. 2
San Diego State..... 2
3. NC State............ 3
Northern Iowa....... 3
IPFW................ 3
Doubles allowed
---------------
1. Georgia Southern.... 0
Miss. Valley State.. 0
Brigham Young....... 0
Central Michigan.... 0
5. 14 tied at.......... 1
Triples allowed
---------------
1. Valparaiso.......... 0
Tulsa............... 0
Arkansas............ 0
San Diego State..... 0
Oregon.............. 0
Home runs allowed
-----------------
1. Central Connecticut. 0
Portland State...... 0
Fordham............. 0
Marshall............ 0
Georgia Southern.... 0
Wild pitches
------------
1. Louisiana-Lafayette. 7
Tennessee........... 7
3. Virginia Tech....... 5
WASHINGTON.......... 5
5. 3 tied at........... 4
Balks
-----
1. Fordham............. 5
2. Brigham Young....... 2
3. South Alabama....... 1
Tennessee........... 1
Northwestern State.. 1
Hit batters
-----------
1. Oklahoma............ 8
2. South Florida....... 7
Nebraska............ 7
Kentucky............ 7
Louisiana-Lafayette. 7
Intentional BB allowed
----------------------
1. Nebraska............ 2
2. Michigan............ 3
3. Oklahoma............ 2
4. UAB................. 1
NC State............ 1
2013 DI Softball Championships
Conference Fielding Leaders (as of Jun 05, 2013)
(All games)
Hitting minimums - 75% of Games
Pitching minimums - 1 Games 75% of Games 1 IP 1 BF 1 Decisions 1.0 IP/Game
Fielding pct
------------
1. Oregon State........ 1.000
Minnesota........... 1.000
Tulsa............... 1.000
Army................ 1.000
5. Texas A&M........... .993
Chances
-------
1. Tennessee........... 321
2. Nebraska............ 313
3. Michigan............ 287
4. Oklahoma............ 273
5. 2 tied at........... 265
Putouts
-------
1. Tennessee........... 228
2. Nebraska............ 204
3. Oklahoma............ 198
4. WASHINGTON.......... 188
5. 2 tied at........... 186
Assists
-------
1. Nebraska............ 96
2. Michigan............ 90
3. Tennessee........... 84
4. WASHINGTON.......... 73
5. Florida............. 72
Errors
------
1. Nebraska............ 13
2. MISSOURI............ 12
3. Michigan............ 11
4. Virginia Tech....... 9
Tennessee........... 9
Fielding double plays
---------------------
1. Nebraska............ 7
2. Michigan............ 6
3. Oklahoma............ 4
4. 5 tied at........... 3
Stolen bases against
--------------------
1. Florida State....... 8
2. Notre Dame.......... 7
Arizona............. 7
Nebraska............ 7
5. 2 tied at........... 6
Caught stealing by
------------------
1. WASHINGTON.......... 4
2. Tennessee........... 3
3. 5 tied at........... 2
Steal attempts against
----------------------
1. Nebraska............ 9
2. Florida State....... 8
Tennessee........... 8
4. 3 tied at........... 7
Passed balls
------------
1. Michigan............ 3
Western Kentucky.... 3
3. 6 tied at........... 2
Catchers interference
---------------------